Privacy

Accept optional first-party analytics or decline. Functional journey and sound preferences stay on this device.

Read the privacy notice

From 22 buttons to one decision

The AI panel inside the Alex CMS editor used to show every action it could take as an equal button: around twenty in the editor, more behind "show all". All of them worked, and I still found it confusing, and I built it. This is what changed and why.

What was wrong

  • No hierarchy. "Generate image" and "Fact-check content" looked equally important on a page that had never been fact-checked.
  • Labels described the tool, not the result: "Complete metadata", "Generate final SEO". You had to know the system to know what you'd get.
  • The scores sat at the top as dashes, with nothing connecting an empty score to the button that fills it.
  • The panel never answered the one question an editor actually has: what should I do next?

What changed

  • Page health leads, in plain words, and each unscored metric is a one-click check.
  • One recommended next step, chosen from the page's actual state, with the reason written next to it.
  • Everything else is folded into four stages of finishing a page: Create, Improve, Verify, Publish. The stage you're in opens by itself.
  • Every label was rewritten outcome-first: "Fact-check it", "Check it sounds like you", "Fill in tags & slug". Routing still keys off the stable action IDs, so no behaviour changed.
  • Typing what you want still works for people who'd rather not click at all.

What I'd still test

I'm the only editor, so this is judgement, not a usability study. The honest next step is watching someone else finish a page with it, and timing how long it takes from an empty draft to published.

See the Alex CMS case study