From 22 buttons to one decision
The AI panel inside the Alex CMS editor used to show every action it could take as an equal button: around twenty in the editor, more behind "show all". All of them worked, and I still found it confusing, and I built it. This is what changed and why.
What was wrong
- No hierarchy. "Generate image" and "Fact-check content" looked equally important on a page that had never been fact-checked.
- Labels described the tool, not the result: "Complete metadata", "Generate final SEO". You had to know the system to know what you'd get.
- The scores sat at the top as dashes, with nothing connecting an empty score to the button that fills it.
- The panel never answered the one question an editor actually has: what should I do next?
What changed
- Page health leads, in plain words, and each unscored metric is a one-click check.
- One recommended next step, chosen from the page's actual state, with the reason written next to it.
- Everything else is folded into four stages of finishing a page: Create, Improve, Verify, Publish. The stage you're in opens by itself.
- Every label was rewritten outcome-first: "Fact-check it", "Check it sounds like you", "Fill in tags & slug". Routing still keys off the stable action IDs, so no behaviour changed.
- Typing what you want still works for people who'd rather not click at all.
What I'd still test
I'm the only editor, so this is judgement, not a usability study. The honest next step is watching someone else finish a page with it, and timing how long it takes from an empty draft to published.
See the Alex CMS case study